![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: PR, USA
Posts: 679
|
![]()
Hi Jim,
I agree it does look like a pioneer sword, specially the mid 19th C. ones from Austria. Yep. it's fully IDed a a Naval Sword (not a cutlass, though) in p.267 of H. Wither's book "World Swords 1400-1945", on the chapter about "Naval Swords". Indeed, I saw recently an EB auction of one, IDing. same a a swedish infantry sidearm, from the russian-swedish wars in Finland. And yet I believe the seller didn't know squat about this blade. He actually let it go for 15% of its appraised book value! But then, isn't that the kind of a deal we ourselves dream about? The buyer was indeed a very lucky bloke! : ) M |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,193
|
![]()
Hi Celtan,
Thank you for noting the source for the identification. I thought I had some reference here in the bookmobile on Swedish arms, but apparantly those books did not 'make the flight'. I do have the handy Wagner 'pocket reference' ![]() I think the term cutlass is likely misleading in the 19th century, as these sidearms were probably more utility weapons than for combat. This is of course why the heavy shellguards gave way to the open and functional grip, and the quillon terminals are simply vestigial decoration. These were probably used much in the way of the Dutch infantry swords I mentioned, or the 'falchions' used by Austrian sappers in about the mid 19th century. I think the only combat potential for these would have been of course on land, in operations much as Marines, but just a thought without more research. You're very right on the pleasant experience of finding a 'sleeper' ! This is truly the key benefit of expanding ones knowledge on these weapons, so that you will have the upper hand in those 'Kodak moments' ! I still treasure those of my own experience from years ago, and the exhaustion of trying to keep my composure in not giving myself away in completing the deal....and the explosion of jubilation and relief when it was done!!! ![]() On the curious cleft pommel, any ideas? I'm sure its again either vestigial or decorative, but it would be interesting to hear thoughts or references on this feature. All best regards, and thanks again for posting this! Jim |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 119
|
![]()
the swedes had contact with the ottomans during the 17th-18th centuries as evidenced by this article
http://www.saudiaramcoworld.com/issu...connection.htm |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Kent
Posts: 2,658
|
![]() Quote:
Hi Jim and Manolo ![]() I too am curious....it reminds me of the 'eared pommels' on a number of Eastern swords/daggers, it would help grip...so perhaps just functional ? Regards David |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: PR, USA
Posts: 679
|
![]()
HUGGARE svensk, m/1810 för Gotlands nationalbeväring, läderbalja
Wiki: History The regiment was created in 1811 when it was decided to organize Nationalbeväringen på Gotland (later Gotlands nationalbeväring) after having experienced the Russian occupation of the island in 1808–1809. The unit was 6,781 men strong and consisted of three artillery companies and 43 companies of infantry and rangers. Gotlands nationalbeväring was reformed into two separate units, Gotlands infanteriregemente and Gotlands artillerikår, in 1887. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Stockholm
Posts: 182
|
![]()
Yup, that's "Gotlandshuggaren", the m/1810. As for the identification as cutlass, that's pretty much just the most direct translation of the Swedish designation (huggare). The pommel, as far as I know, is unique amongst Swedish models.
Expanding a bit on the "odd Swedish things" with possible oriental roots-theme, an officer named Hafström designed a few different models for the Swedish army and Navy in the 19th century (adopted models range from 1838 to 1885 that I know of) with a "half-leafblade" design which seems pretty unique as far as European 19th century blades go, or at least as far as I've seen. has anyone seen anything else like them in Europe around that time? Any ideas what might have inspired him? The pictures shows the army's "Fascine knife" m/1848 (replaced the "cutlass" as the standard infantry sidearm IIRC), and a mid-century saber which I've seen attributed both to Stockholm's city militia, and Stockholm's police. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: PR, USA
Posts: 679
|
![]()
Thanks Kisak,
BTW, any idea why the M1810 is IDed as a M1800 naval weapon in Wither's Book? Best M |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Stockholm
Posts: 182
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 256
|
![]()
A throwback, perhaps, to the Celtic eared pommel?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: PR, USA
Posts: 679
|
![]()
The orientation wouldn't be right. All the antennas (Tene) I saw in galicia were oriented parallel to the blade, this one is perpendicular. Thhe reason may have been to help the wielder be able to hit more easily with the blade's flat side, like a hammer, or for crowd control...
I've seen some arabic and hindi weapons with a bigger version of the hilt, perhaps to help pushing it into the hapless victim, or to prevent someone from removing it away from the owner's handhold.. ![]() M |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|