![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Greensboro, NC
Posts: 1,087
|
![]()
I don't believe I have taken up enough bandwith so let me provide some more close up shots. The second grouping:
1) This is a bold active pattern from an early Persian wootz blade. 2) This is an interesting wootz pattern due to the vertical striping that shows up in the pattern. I do not know what that is from. Probably Turkish, possibly Persian 3) This is a bold active pattern from a slightly later Persian wootz blade than #1 4) This is from an Indian Shamshir and is common for Indian wootz. It exhibits a very tight pattern of low contrast. 5) This is from a Caucasian Shaska and is actually forged by Russian smiths. I will call it Zlatoust wootz. 6) This is from a Turkish Kilij and is wootz and of the pattern typically referred to as Sham. |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|