|  | 
|  | 
|  30th July 2008, 04:21 PM | #1 | 
| Keris forum moderator Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Nova Scotia 
					Posts: 7,250
				 |   
			
			It is certainly in Bali dress, but i am not convinced that the blade is Balinese. It looks more Javanese to my eyes.  I agree that the sarong is older while the hilt(s) and the uwer are new. Nothing wrong with that.   Your Bali hilt is no great piece of carving, but it has a nice expression IMO. I like it. An older hilt wouldn't necessarily be all that different. There are countless styles of Bali hilts. | 
|   |   | 
|  30th July 2008, 11:03 PM | #2 | 
| Member Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Australia 
					Posts: 96
				 |   
			
			Thank you for your comments David    Would that be East Java? It feels like a practical piece to me   | 
|   |   | 
|  31st July 2008, 01:09 AM | #3 | 
| Member Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Australia 
					Posts: 96
				 |   
			
			If it is helpful, here are some different blade perspectives. I have given blade a light etch and can see a pamor? Cheers, Daniel | 
|   |   | 
|  31st July 2008, 05:36 AM | #4 | |
| Member Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Italy 
					Posts: 928
				 |   Quote: 
 Is the surface smooth or not ? How is the colour/aspect of the hole on the bottom ? | |
|   |   | 
|  31st July 2008, 09:55 AM | #5 | 
| Member Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: The Netherlands 
					Posts: 1,209
				 |   
			
			I think this keris is from Bali or Lombok. The blade was rather neglected, but in my opinion it was a polished blade. An attractive ukiran. Hard to tell if it is an old one from the picture. Wrangka seems to have some age. The gandar is a more recent replacement. You better etch the blade with warangan to get the pamor out again. | 
|   |   | 
|  | 
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread | 
| Display Modes | |
| 
 | 
 |