![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 119
|
![]()
something i noticed right away was that the blade was shorter (only 23 inches long) than most tulwars ive seen before. perhaps this made it a better hand to hand combat weapon than the longer horseback tulwars?
maybe it was an infantry weaspon? |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|