Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > Ethnographic Weapons

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 2nd May 2008, 06:09 AM   #5
Nathaniel
Member
 
Nathaniel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 865
Default

Battara,

Thanks for your comments. Yes, I agree, it is a shame that the end of the ivory hilt is damaged...I would have liked to see what it looked like intact...but also like the damage in someways...gives it character...the ivory carving and repousse is very well done...especially the ivory carving is better than most I've seen...

I'm wondering if any have seen pieces similar...I have seen one other...but it's ivory handle was not as intricate. The owner said 'he had always thought it was burmese, but another historian told him it was "shan thai, and probably made for a thai in 19thc around 1850 to 1900, ill go with her on it though as its been a mystery to me since i bought it last year in auction here, it might be from pitsanaluk which was close to the burma border and had a mixed burmese thai decorational art history"
Nathaniel is offline   Reply With Quote
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:28 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.