![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Big old machine shop/foundry/warehouse in Atlanta GA USA
Posts: 51
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Greenville, NC
Posts: 1,854
|
![]()
....first let me say I bow my head in shame at what my "southern brutha from anotha mutha"(RSword) said above!!....good lawd Rick!
As for restoration I agree with the "leave it be" crowd. Were a portion of the cockatou missing, I'd say go for it, but in this case you would be essentially rebuilding the most "artsie" part of the hilt, making it "new". This would only be for some one intending to keep the barong for a very long time, accepting its restored features. Once such a change is made the collectiblity of the barong will go down in the eyes of many....one, because of its new addition, regardless of quality, and secondly because there is no guarantee the restoration is correct to what the original hilt actually had.. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,272
|
![]()
You people are wonderful for my self-esteem.
![]() When it comes to ivory on this piece, I would have to look into the amount for pre-ban ivory. Silver or even dark wood with ivory pieces would be a little cheaper. This piece does not seem to need too much restoration except for the missing pommel. Of course one other thing to consider is that restorations and replacements happened over the life of many pieces. Here I especially see Charles' point (every pun intended ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The Aussie Bush
Posts: 4,362
|
![]()
Battara:
If I have room in my case I will bring it to Timonium and we can discuss. Ian. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|