HISTORY OF STEEL IN EASTERN ASIA EXHIBITION NOW ONLINE

MABAGANI · 5th January 2007, 07:04 PM

The version of the process presented is different from my actual experience.
The Asian game schedule came and went with no communications from the museum to me about what was going on.
I was out of the picture in Nov 2005.

At what point did the museum decide to change the exhibit from a world exhibit to an exhibit about Eastern Asia and remove other sections?
Who made the final decision to leave the Philippines section in, knowing the team had a couple of months to deadlines and was starting from scratch?
It was unreasonable to expect one person or even the whole team to do a decent article in a month and half following the final selection.
It was not worth the risk of the teams reputation and personal belongings of the contributors in the rush to completion.
Damage was done and who should be held accountable?
Who was responsible for putting the Philippines section in the precarious situation?

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Threaded Mode

5th January 2007, 07:04 PM	#34
MABAGANI Member Join Date: Dec 2004 Posts: 221	The version of the process presented is different from my actual experience. The Asian game schedule came and went with no communications from the museum to me about what was going on. I was out of the picture in Nov 2005. At what point did the museum decide to change the exhibit from a world exhibit to an exhibit about Eastern Asia and remove other sections? Who made the final decision to leave the Philippines section in, knowing the team had a couple of months to deadlines and was starting from scratch? It was unreasonable to expect one person or even the whole team to do a decent article in a month and half following the final selection. It was not worth the risk of the teams reputation and personal belongings of the contributors in the rush to completion. Damage was done and who should be held accountable? Who was responsible for putting the Philippines section in the precarious situation?