![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Keris forum moderator
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 7,229
|
![]()
Does anyone else think that this blade might be of Indonesian origin?
Beautiful BTW. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,255
|
![]() Quote:
![]() I don't think the blade was ever supposed to be fitted with an Asang-asang - the file work in that area resembles more the usual keris style and is one of the reasons why I think a keris smith made this blade. It also seems to have regular pamor. The latter seems to be invariably present on modern reproductions by Maduranese smiths. However, this piece looks nicer than all those "Madura Kris" I've seen and I'd be tempted to believe this is a genuine (vintage?) Malay/Straits piece with new(er) quality fittings. Maybe our forumites from Singapore can chime in? Regards, Kai |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 173
|
![]()
I don't bought it by Adni. The seller was Asoka arts in England. I took the pics.
Paolo |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 173
|
![]()
You seems interested to the blade, so I send two other pics, not too good, of the pamor.
Regards Paolo |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Singapore
Posts: 1,248
|
![]()
Hi Paolo,
From the fittings, looks like a Malay Sundang of Peninsular Malaysia. ![]() It is common to find Malay Sundang without the clamps. Here is one example. Note the difference in blade material. The fittings are similar. http://www.geocities.com/keris4u/ker...elayu_luk5.htm |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 173
|
![]()
How old do you think the keris might be ?
Regards Paolo |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Greenville, NC
Posts: 1,854
|
![]()
The asthetics of the blade certainly say Indonesian, but the length and girth do not. The Malay attribution makes more sense. In the other (Malay)example given via link, I think we could also agree that there have been elements of the hilt that have been reworked, as it does not match in age, or fit, the blade and Adni notes this in his description(late 20th Cent.). The scabbard seems virtually identical in style to the one presented, but is newer.
I think it is a composite piece, but of quality parts. I would like to know more about the very interesting blade. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|