![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 400
|
![]() Quote:
Bier gives as tribe with this bayu the "Kantuk" tribe from upriver Kapuas. It must be a tribe related to the kajan as you see on the style of the hilt. what I think is that the bayu was in use by different tribes all over Borneo. seen to the very different handles ( I also found two examples in the collection of the Leiden Museum wich had totally different styles) one was mentioned as "South Borneo". Arjan |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 951
|
![]()
Hi Arjan what is the time they bring the weapons in
Ben |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 400
|
![]()
Hi Ben,
one ( 16-284 ) is a very early collected piece came in to the museum around 1860 but was from the journey of Salomon Muller who visited Borneo in 1836. Salomon visited the south of Borneo the aria upriver Barito from Banjarmassin. In his book there's one time that he mentioned " we bought some chickens and other food,some mats,weaponery and jewellery" in the village Lontontoer.So its possible that he obtained this Bayu there. the other (781-04) I'm not for sure but the number is from just before 1900. the handle looks almost chinese and the scabbard has a " never used patina". Arjan. |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 202
|
![]()
Some additional information that may be helpful: 781-104 (781-04 does not exist) is, according to Juynboll, called a pisau poelang banaga (sword with a hilt with a naga). It has been collected in South-East Borneo by Mr. W.E.M.S. Aernout and has come into the collection of the museum in 1890, from his legacy.
Albert |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sweden
Posts: 1,637
|
![]()
Thanks Albert and Arjan,
Why isn't 781-104 among the other Bayu in Juynboll but placed among the transition swords to Mandau? Doesn't the blade follow the regular Bayu shape? There is one additional Bayu in the picture archive as well as Juynboll, 659-87. It's unfortunately hard to see the details of its wooden hilt (it's the one classified as Bejadju). Also, in my version, the German one (I assume you have the Dutch version?), on page 238 (the last sword before Latok starts), there is referred to "E.C.V. 90" instead of a regular catalogue number. Do you kow what that means and how to find the picture of this 4th Bayu? Michael |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 951
|
![]()
HI Albert and don t forget there is a lot off missing off the collection in Leiden
i heard from someone that has been there for his study that a lot off objects might been stolen or disappear . THERE WAS AN INVESTIGATION BUT THEY STOPPED THIS BECAUSE TO MUCH MISSING . Ben |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Houston, TX, USA
Posts: 1,254
|
![]()
These spearpoint (bayu?) madaus do not (except for the one in hte b&w pic) seem to be truly double edged, but to have a false edge bevelled more for thrusting than for cutting?
The wide triangular dagger bears an interesting resemblance to modern Moro gunongs/punals, as does the narrow dagger to tombaks and tombak daggers. |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 2,235
|
![]()
A friend has this spear in his collection (well actually in a corner of his cellar, but he is sadly not considering to let it go
![]() take a look at the dohong in Zonneveld's, the decoration at the base, the way the sides are sharpened only from one side of the blade. This blade seems very much a spearhead to me, but the dohong in Zonneveld is now a puzzle to me. is it a dagger or a spearhead hilted as a dagger ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 951
|
![]()
Here some pics
Ben |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|