Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > Ethnographic Weapons

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 27th September 2006, 04:42 PM   #6
Bill M
Member
 
Bill M's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: USA Georgia
Posts: 1,599
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CharlesS
A nice Sumatran parang, but I don't think it's Batak.

Is the patination of the scabbard consistent with the hilt??

There is a market for remade scabbards(new wood with original or new fittings) in Sumatra to complete old swords. I am seeing this especially as add-ons to nice old sekins. Knowing where this parang came from I think that may very well be what you have here, an older sword with later scabbard, or at least the wood and bone is later. Still, tastefully done, and far better than a 'nakeeed' blade!

Nice piece!
Yeah, I got to get off this "Batak" idea. Sumatran from Palembang.

I also think that you are right on about the scabbard and fittings are later. It looks to me that the hilt silver is better made than the scabbard silver. Better craftsmanship.

The patina was pretty much the same all over, however, when I began cleaining.
Bill M is offline   Reply With Quote
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:26 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.