![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Kent
Posts: 2,658
|
It would be a shame to etch it IMHO......
The notch on the back before the false edge is interesting...is it there to relieve stress and shock to the blade ? Or has it another function? |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,670
|
Puullleeese leave it as is!!!!!
Outstanding worn old warrior.Is the back edge of the blade sharpened up to that raised section? Check the discussion on 'Old 1900's Indian sword'...same type feature. Best, Jim |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 210
|
Is this a flyssa, or a yatagan? It looks more like a Black Sea yatagan to me.
n2s |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,670
|
JUDL!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 655
|
Actually I also thought the same thing - can be a Trabzon short sword, but I don't know much about flyssas, so if you say its flyssa, flyssa it is.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 692
|
It could be, actually the quality of the blade suggests so, BUT it is not a short sword (84 cm), the hilt is wooden and of totally different design and finally there should be fullers all over it if it were from Black Sea region.
So I still think that it is an archaic form flyssa, lets say around 1800. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Room 101, Glos. UK
Posts: 4,259
|
also looks like a batak kalasan, except for the hilting & integral bolster - the blade shape seems fairly universal. was there a scabbard with it? that could be diagnostic. (overall looks like an old undecorated flyssa to me)
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|