![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2021
Location: Leiden, NL
Posts: 679
|
Could it be a Hanuman face maybe?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,164
|
I was thinking Tiger head, and google lens suggested Tiger or Lion!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,860
|
Thank you guys for responses!
Ian this is excellent and as you indicate, mine is certainly not unique. This is encouraging as it supports the idea that these distinctively decorated hilts may be to a Garuda oriented warrior cult. As suggested earlier, perhaps these hilts are paired with venerated blades, typically older, and possibly these blades were significant as having belonged to noted warriors (much as the monuments made for them). Often the hilts can also be older, as this one which is 17-18th c. and much later blade. In the case of this example, the figure depicted in the hilt is a makara, which was also associated as a vishnu of Garuda. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2021
Location: Leiden, NL
Posts: 679
|
To elaborate, the reason I was thinking it might be Hanuman are the "cheeks", the third eye, the human nose, and the fact that he is a deity. Although the ears admittedly seem a bit cat like.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The Aussie Bush
Posts: 4,736
|
Werecow,
That seems a good suggestion. The ears are a significant difference I think, but the third eye is a very good observation and a strong point for your ID. Regards, ian. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,860
|
I agree, that image really helps a lot. It seems there a lot of variations in the depictions of these deities.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|