![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2025
Posts: 18
|
Quote:
I would be remiss without mentioning Matthew Forde's La Sciabola, which you can access via the internet with a 1-time-fee as well as a physical copy he occasionally has for sale. I owe him many sword photos when I get my army-in-waiting sent to me finally. It is in English with some photos in the back though more of a chronology of various patterns & tied to the Savoy history of unifying Italy. Would go so far as to say there is an implicit assumption the reader is mildly familiar with Italian sabres to begin with, or is able to supplement reading with google-fu, but that is by no means a criticism at large, just something to be aware of going in. From what I've learned over my brief tenure so far, the major roadblock in reprints and new books is less the information and more museum copyright laws for the photos listed which makes it quite difficult. What is the most impressive element of the 1833 pictured above, to me, is that it has retained the throat of the scabbard! Not sure why those were such high priority thefts and only for Italian swords. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Black Forest, Germany
Posts: 1,268
|
two very useful books on Italian arms are these volumes 1&2
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2025
Posts: 18
|
Any recommendations for Neapolitan/Southern States & Papal States reference guides? I'd consider myself more knowledgeable than most on those types but even for me there's a whole lot of "yeah I have no idea, it's definitely Italian but isn't a Savoy pattern so let's just go with Naples/Kingdom of 2 Sicilies" for most. I have what Czernys sold as a Papal States sword a year ago that has one of those revolutionary French type of elegant brass guards with the s curves, but could only trace the provenance back to a previous auction for the same sword, and other examples seem to be closer to broad pattern guidelines without official regulations.
I did just win what appears to be a Wilkinson made 1834 Guides Regiment sword from Czernys. Blade has British markings & no proof disc, but the 5 bars of the guard and the checkered thumb rest on the backstrap & other details all seem to back up this being 100% English made but for the Guides. If it IS Wilkinson, I would be able to trace the s/n and see who ordered it. We know Garibaldi had multiple British sabres including what appears to be an 1857 Royal Engineers pattern. Very excited to receive that along with all the others in my army-in-waiting! |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: In the wee woods north of Napanee Ontario
Posts: 431
|
Your Guides regt sword must have been misidentified. The blade type was not used by officers this early on, not until 1845. The sword sadly is not a Wilkinson. I don't see the Guide connection.
The sword is an interesting example having a post 1845p British Blade with a for lack of better naming, a Continental hilt. There must be an interesting story behind it. Officers were attached to other countries armies and this sword may be a result of that. I would be interested to see the auctioneers description for a better understanding |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|