![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,414
|
I also notice that the ganja has been bashed pretty hard on its side near where the tang passes through. Is there evidence of the same on the other side?
I think we're looking at a repair here; no self-respecting Pande would have done that during manufacture. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2026
Location: Washington state, USA
Posts: 5
|
Yes, but I'm quite sure those are wear marks from the baca baca. Hopefully this shows up clearly:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,382
|
This blade is from the Maguindanao tribe. They make a lot of (if not all of) these blades. It looks like a separate ganga to me, but many times the fit is so tight that lines practically disappear.
Looks like there was one baka-baka. The tang seems to have been broken off later, thus being short. And they often did silver inlay on these naga blades. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The Aussie Bush
Posts: 4,679
|
I would need an X-ray to convince me that this gangya is separate rather than a couple of engraved lines with an extensive gap between. The most recent picture shows inlaid silver work passing across where a line of separation would be expected and there is no discontinuity of the inlaid sections to suggest any separation underneath. Speculation about the existence or not of a separation line is best answered with an X-ray, and that is a simple test. Kris without separate gangya are sometimes fitted with asang asang.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,318
|
It makes no sense to create a design, which goes over the separation line between blade and Gangya, and at the same time incise this separation line, in case blade wouldn't have a separate Gangya.
The Kris, which Detlef posted in this thread, also has a design going over the separation line, and has a separate Gangya (according to the owner), even better hidden. A very thight fit on Maguindanao and Maranao blades from early 20th cent. is nothing unusual. I guess the Gangya in such cases was fitted when everything was still hot. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,318
|
The Baca-Baca probably was of this type:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The Aussie Bush
Posts: 4,679
|
Thanks Gustav. Short of pulling the kris apart and physically separating the gangya to confirm that it is indeed a separate construction, the only way to show conclusively that it is separate is via X-ray. I have done this many times and confirmed that a line of separation is readily visible when present. This is much easier than taking the hilt off.
As far as the inlaid silver decoration crossing a possible line of separation without interruption on at least two examples of this style of kris, this seems to be evidence that there is no line of separation present. Until I can find another example and X-ray it, I remain skeptical that these relatively modern kris actually have separate gangya. Regards, Ian. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|