![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Germany, Dortmund
Posts: 9,525
|
Quote:
That it is bone is clearly visible, my question was which sort of bone it could be? I ask because the seller suggested that it could be human bone! ![]() Regards, Detlef |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,770
|
Yikes! While there have been cases of human remains used in such a way, most notably in Tibet, where there are unusual perspectives toward such things, but I had not been aware of any such practices here. I suppose only forensic examination might reveal that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Germany, Dortmund
Posts: 9,525
|
Quote:
![]() I know that collectors of New Guinea bone daggers are able to distinguish between Cassowary bone daggers and human bone daggers, I think that the colour of the bone is the key. Also the bulge of the bone plays a rule. Regards, Detlef |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Germany, Dortmund
Posts: 9,525
|
I personally think that it's very unlikely that the hilt is from human bone, the dagger is 31,4 cm long, so the handle will be a little bit under 10 cm long, which human bone would fit this size?
I think that the dagger could be a "coup de grace" dagger from a rich/important person from the mid. to end of the 19th century and the bone is maybe from a deer leg. I asked which bone it could be because the seller brought human bone in play but I personally think that this is most unlikely. I also don't think that it is a Freemason dagger, but this is a personal guess since I just don't know enough about this category of daggers.But it would be interesting to read what others think about this dagger!
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|