Help please ,any info?

[A. G. Maisey]

That's a good article you've linked to Jaya.

Obviously the author enjoys writing.

In respect of the pamor for this keris, I'd be a bit hesitant in giving it as pedaringan kebak. Pamor PK is a sub-variation of wos wutah (beras wutah) & it requires the pamor to provide an almost complete cover of the body of the wilah. The photos do not permit us to see the wilah with clarity. I do not know if this pamor is PK or not.

[aspalathos]

Originally Posted by A. G. Maisey

That's a good article you've linked to Jaya.

Obviously the author enjoys writing.

In respect of the pamor for this keris, I'd be a bit hesitant in giving it as pedaringan kebak. Pamor PK is a sub-variation of wos wutah (beras wutah) & it requires the pamor to provide an almost complete cover of the body of the wilah. The photos do not permit us to see the wilah with clarity. I do not know if this pamor is PK or not.

Hi tnx. Please what photk do you need . Can you mark on the photo olease so I can take better photo.

[A. G. Maisey]

Pedaringan Kebak is a sub-type of wos wutah, it is an individual opinion in respect of whether or not the amount of the core covered by the pamor motif is sufficient for that pamor motif to be named as pedaringan kebak, naming it as this doesn't really change anything, it is stiil wos wutah.

However, in order to determine whether a wos wutah pamor can get the extra little lift of "pedaringan kebak" we need to clearly see the full blade, both sides.

Take the photos in open shade, use a small aperture, ie, larger F stop, probably something of F11 or above. Most phones take pretty bad photos, newer , expensive ones are not bad, but what most people have just don't cut it for halfway decent keris photos.