![]() |
![]() |
#24 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Singapore
Posts: 1,248
|
![]()
DhenTal wrote:
> I don't think that the photos was posted by sang kris is a good piece. What constitute a good or bad piece? In my opinion, it may not be old but still it is a nicely built piece. > How can anybody give opinion that this kriss is so beautiful ? I just look a > kriss with a glamour scabbard. Kriss it self, not older than 5 yrs, but it was > give some chemical so that it look so old. Beauty is in the eyes of the beholder. It may be real/fake or new/old, it doesn't matter as much in terms of beauty. The intricity of the artwork and detailing of the ukiran deserves mention. ![]() Dhental, if you mix in a keris community, you would know that your comment style is considered inappropriate in keris culture ethics. (Never criticise a piece in public, unless it is specifically asked for by the owner). Last edited by prime; 1st February 2005 at 07:29 AM. Reason: grammar |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|