![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: May 2021
Location: Central Europe
Posts: 174
|
![]()
I do not know about those markings but I can offer you my opinion on that sword.
The certainly old blade looks odd, I would rule out a classical Central European origin. I would re-evaluate a Persian origin. The crossguard looks original at first glance. Similar can be found on 17th century Polish and Ottoman Karabelas alike. The grip, while looking old, is not a typical Karabela hilt. The star formed brass plates at the peens are not original, those edges would have caused wounds on the wielders hands. It may seem like not a problem when holding the sword calmly, but even the slightest edges irritate the skin after few minutes of movement - think about this like a stone in your shoe while walking. In theory it is imaginable that the wood plates themselves are the product of someone in the 17/18th century who was barely familiar with Karabela hilts. But it´s very far from the known types. I say this as someone who opposes discarding artifacts solely by style. In my opinion this likely a put together sword with an old blade and crossguard with a new (amateur made) grip. Unlikely, but thinkable, it´s a very odd original sabre with useless later restored peens. Termnologically I wouldn´t call it a Karabela although it certainly approaches that design. |
![]() |
![]() |
Tags |
karabela.blade.markings. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|