An amalgmation of Europe and Asia, Shamshir

[GePi]

Interesting blade! The cartouche on the flat is not surprising, it reads amal-e Assadullah Esfahani - work of Assad Allah of Isfahan.

The inscription on the spine is beyond my paygrade, although I think I can make out a few words. I do not know if someone competent in arabic/persian/turkish translation still posts here, the last post by kwiatek was almost two years ago responding to a translation request of mine
I would advise to try to take better pictures though, preferably without glare, and I don't think the whole inscription in the posted pictures.

[Kmaddock]

Thanks GePi

Fernando why do you think the handle might not be a real one were these copied by traditional makers?
It is old for certain
Thanks
Ken

[corrado26]

The model for the piece shown may have been the French infantry saber M an 9, but it differs significantly from this local ordnance piece. The material thickness of the handrail is significantly thicker at the transition to the handle and the shape does not correspond to the original. I am also of the opinion that the really sophisticated blade and the grip did not originally belong together.

[Kmaddock]

Thanks Corrado,

They have been together a long time, the guy I got it off had it for 40 years he said it was expensive when he got it but was happy to move it on in a trade, I just like it for what it is to be honest.

I am not sure if the peening that i see is the original blade remnants in the handle or the blade that is presently there, The present blade might just be held in with glue or resin

Regards,

ken

[David R]

Looks familiar, and I might have seen it on another forum. I had one like this some years ago, a nice wootz shamshir blade, stuck into a poor casting from a Victorian bandsman's sword.
I let it go, not really knowing what to do with it, I do now, but the sword is long gone.

[Jim McDougall]

Ken, thank you for the note in the OP, you know me well
Each sword has its story to tell.

Clearly in form this hilt is of the rather scarce 'model 9' as well described by Udo. As I understand, these were produced 1801-1803 and by BOUTET at Versailles.
I am not familiar enough with French Napoleonic arms to argue for or against this not corresponding to the character of the original examples.......but I have one question.
Why in the world would anyone copy a briquet? these munitions grade weapons are hardly the grade sought by Napoleonic collectors in my thinking. I suppose they're a bit more desirable than the British briquet I bought in the 60s for ten bucks

Then to see this combination of what seems a very high quality Persian blade, even though probably not actually Assad Alllah but one of the subsequent blades using the name (in the manner of the spurious use of the Toledo masters names).

Is it possible that this model briquet might have been produced by another maker/works? following the general design.

Then the question is, what likely French colonial context might his combination have been assembled?

IMO a most attractive and intriguing sword Ken, no wonder you grabbed it!
Easy on the cleaning the patina really gives it character.

[Kmaddock]

[
Easy on the cleaning the patina really gives it character.[/QUOTE]

Don't worry Jim, I am not a fan if shiny things and the brass will never be cleaned by me .

I might try and bring out the pattern on the blade though as it is very attractive.
Keep well
Ken

[fernando]

Originally Posted by Kmaddock

Thanks GePi

Fernando why do you think the handle might not be a real one were these copied by traditional makers?
It is old for certain
Thanks
Ken

Udo said it all ...



-