|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Do you think we need our own www pubilication? | |||
| Yes, only to publish proceeding of Baltimore conference. |
   
|
3 | 21.43% |
| Yes, to publish review articles based on threads and proceedings. |
  
|
6 | 42.86% |
| Yes, but only to display selected past threads with non-relevant information purged out |
  
|
1 | 7.14% |
| Yes, but not only 1 and 2, but also submitted articles |
  
|
5 | 35.71% |
| No, we do not need any extras |
  
|
1 | 7.14% |
| Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 14. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
12th June 2006, 08:28 AM
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 372
|
The world of peer reviewed journals is moving more and more to electronic publication. I am on the editorial board of one scientific journal and review and produce invited contributions for others. All are now available in both hard and electronic form. The chief editor of one of these told me recently that they did not expect to be producing a 'hard copy' beyond the next 5 years.
IMHO the idea of publishing bits of this forum probably has little merit due to the difficulties mentioned in the previous thread and the accessibility of the information in the archives. The concept of a peer reviewed journal is good, although running such an animal is time and resource consuming. DrD |
|
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Threaded Mode