![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 2,145
|
From what I see it's 99% Qajar 19th c.
It will be 100% if the whole sword is shown for confirmation. Maybe with round tip, it'll be Indian or Indo-Persian...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,422
|
Please show a picture of the whole piece so that you may gain more feedback.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2021
Posts: 113
|
Here is a full picture of my Persian sword. It had been described as a Qajar Dynasty piece. But some of the floral koftgari on it seems to me to be similar to a Shamshir attributed to the Afsharid era. So if anyone has specific insight on the possibility, I would be most appreciative.
Thanks. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2021
Posts: 113
|
Hi, it’s taking 8-24 hours to upload my posts for some reason. Here is another picture of the entire Persian sword.
Thanks |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2021
Posts: 113
|
A full length picture. Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 478
|
It is Qajar, made in the reign of Nasr al-Din Shah (r. 1848-1896.)
He was responsible for the neoclassicism in arms and armor and generally, for Iran's cultural revival. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: California
Posts: 1,036
|
I wonder what the significance is of the tokhes-shaped or gluteoform tip.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 2,145
|
Quote:
So probably a baby zulfiqar... It will make more sense in Persian context.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: California
Posts: 1,036
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|