SAMAL BARUNG2

Ian · 8th August 2020, 07:37 AM

The pictures are rather dark and the hilt is hard to see. However, I think both the hilt and scabbard are pre-WWII, perhaps 1920–1940. A clearer picture of the hilt would help.

tanaruz · 8th August 2020, 09:13 AM

Hello,

Thanks for the info. Here are additional pictures.

Regards,

Yves

Ian · 9th August 2020, 01:02 AM

Thanks Yves. Yes, that's what I thought the kakatua probably looked like. I think 1920–1940 should encompass its age.

tanaruz · 9th August 2020, 01:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ian

Thanks Yves. Yes, that's what I thought the kakatua probably looked like. I think 1920–1940 should encompass its age.

Hello Sir,

Much thanks Sir.

Kindest regards,

Yves

8th August 2020, 09:13 AM	#2
tanaruz Member Join Date: Apr 2020 Posts: 276	SAMAL BARUNG2 Hello, Thanks for the info. Here are additional pictures. Regards, Yves Attached Images

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

8th August 2020, 07:37 AM	#1
Ian Vikingsword Staff Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: The Aussie Bush Posts: 4,414	The pictures are rather dark and the hilt is hard to see. However, I think both the hilt and scabbard are pre-WWII, perhaps 1920–1940. A clearer picture of the hilt would help.

9th August 2020, 01:02 AM	#3
Ian Vikingsword Staff Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: The Aussie Bush Posts: 4,414	Thanks Yves. Yes, that's what I thought the kakatua probably looked like. I think 1920–1940 should encompass its age.