![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 | ||
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Minneapolis,MN
Posts: 378
|
Quote:
A bit about me. I'm an American, and so a bit removed from the original context of FMA. The flavor of FMA that I study comes through Dan Inosanto, a Filipino American who picked up the art mostly from older Filipino immigrants in California. So it's more than a little syncratic and demystified. I'm well aware that most of guys guro Dan learned from were Vasayan (though one, Juanito LaCoste, supposedly learned from a Moro family in Mindanao, but I take that with a grain of salt). I suspect that the inclusion of Moro weapon trainers has more to due to their reputation as an "unconquerable people" (and maybe how often you see those "Weapons of Moroland" plaques in Filipino-American homes) than any roots of FMA systems. While I do study FMA, I consider Silat to by my name art, specifically Mande muda (from Sunda) after Pak Herman Suwanda, and now his sister, Ibu Rita. However, I've also studied Silat Suffian Bela Diri with Maul Mornie. Quote:
That said, 1) I'm not an advanced FMA practitioner (like I said, I think of silat as my main art). 2) I'm not going very hard or fast with them (They are antiques!). So take that for what it is. Have fun, Leif |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Keris forum moderator
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 7,300
|
As others have suggested, it would be a shame mess up this lovely inlay by practicing with this piece. It would, however, make a nice wall hanger.
I often see unadorned wooden swords for sale that i suspect are more likely meant for practice. Here is a kris and a barong. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Keris forum moderator
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 7,300
|
I do agree with xasterix's take on FMA though and working with the wooden swords i posted above would not be likely to give the practitioner a very good feel for the weight and balance of actual kris and barong weapons.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Minneapolis,MN
Posts: 378
|
David,
Those are definitely intended for training. Whether or not they're good for impact training (i.e. hitting things with) is a matter of some debate. For a lot of FMA practitioners, it depends on the kind of wood. Kamagong is often seen as less useful for impact training, as when it breaks, it tends to shatter and create tons of little shards. Bahi, on the other hand, will fray like rattan does. Quote:
Have fun, Leif |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Minneapolis,MN
Posts: 378
|
Well, if no one has seen one like this, let me ask these questions.
Does the inlay work seem Filipino, from a style perspective? If so, from where in the Philippines? While it matches the profile rather closely of an antique moro kris (even being shorter in length than a lot of modern training equipment) but the inlay doesn't seem very Moro to my (largely untrained) eyes. Am I right in thinking that the mother of pearl indicates WWII or later? Thanks, Leif |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2018
Posts: 715
|
Quote:
Thanks for taking my assertion constructively. Moving forward, the inlay work is reminiscent of ukkil from Sulu. While the ukkil I usually encounter on modern BangsaMoro weapons - especially those made by the Tausug- have waves as primary motif, there would be vines from time to time, or creeping plants with flowers (such as the one depicted on your wooden kris). The first thing I usually look at is symmetry- if it's symmetrical, then there's a stronger probability that it was made by BangsaMoro hands (although can't really be 100% sure; there are weapon reproduction outfits that counterfeit well). There are usually two types of symmetry: AB - BA, the most common (mirror), and AB - AB (same theme, but not mirrored; repeated) and I can see both types occurring on your wooden kris. Regarding age, it's difficult to ascertain, as modern-day pieces still use MOP. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|