Why were the ingots mostly round?

Jens Nordlunde · 4th April 2006, 01:18 PM

Hi all, sorry for my absence.

Thank you for the answers witch I find very interesting. As the one who knows little about the subject, I have an additional question.

From the answers you have written I understand, that the bigger the ingots were the more difficult it was to make them. As far as I know the ingots varied in size from a few hundred grams to about 3 kg, but most were made for making two sword blades out of an ingot. If the big ingots were so difficult to make, why did they not make the small ones only? Is it possible to forge left over from two different ingots together and get a good result? How close it the wooz pattern in the ingots made in the same furnace?

Jeff Pringle · 4th April 2006, 04:19 PM

Quote:

If the big ingots were so difficult to make, why did they not make the small ones only?

Taken as an entire process, I don't think there is a huge difference in difficulty between big and small ingots, and there are considerations such as efficiency of the furnace, and success rate of the final product.
Plus, as anyone who is making the stuff can tell you, many of the 'two-sword' ingots get to be 'one sword'- or 'several knife'-sized by the end of the forging process - if you only made ingots big enough for a sword, you'd end up with a lot of knives, and maybe not enough swords!

Quote:

Is it possible to forge left over from two different ingots together and get a good result?

They did it back in the day, I don't know if anyone has gotten the technique down in modern times.

Quote:

How close it the wooz pattern in the ingots made in the same furnace?

Very different, even within the same batch or ingot. I think Ric Furrer did a test of a Sri Lankan(?) type of crucible that was designed to be laid on it's side when the metal was molten, to give an oblong bar - IIRC, two ingots made of the same metal fired at the same time gave very different patterns in the final surface.
I find a fair degree of uniformity in patterns within an ingot, but each ingot varies in pattern depending mainly on carbon content and solidification rate.

Justin - this article explains the patterning in wootz steel -
http://www.tms.org/pubs/journals/JOM...even-9809.html

Jens Nordlunde · 4th April 2006, 05:08 PM

Hi Jeff, thank you for your interesting answer.
Since you write that a ‘two sword’ ingot easily could end up as a few daggers ingot, there must be a big difference of how much slag there it in the different ingots?

Jeff Pringle · 4th April 2006, 05:50 PM

No, not slag - sometimes there are 'air' bubbles that need to be worked around, sometimes cracks appear. Typically slag inclusions in wootz are fairly minor.

Jens Nordlunde · 4th April 2006, 09:30 PM

I am rather puzzled. ‘Air’ bubbles, what is that, and how do you work your way around them? It is the first time I have ever heard about it.
The cracks are something interesting. I know of course that they appeared; most of the collectors know this, but why? One would think that when a blade is heated and worked on cracks would disappear, that the forging would make the blade more homogeneous, so why are the cracks still there?

Justin · 4th April 2006, 10:37 PM

Thanks,Jeff.

PUFF · 5th April 2006, 03:40 AM

Unlike solid state smelting, the wootz smelting turn whole thing to liquid mixture. With slow cooling, liq. slag and liq. metal separated into two distintive phases like water and oil. Most of impurities partitioned into slag phase and floated up to the surface. I don't know about air bubble. Any bubble in the ingot indicates that smelting temperature 's too low and such a low smelting temp could trap some slag either.

Cracks are not "as baked" flaw. They happened when forging stress goes beyond the material elasticity (either forging temp 's too low or hammering 's too hard). Dear Jens, forging would make the blade more homogeneous as slag inclusions were forged out. But flaws like crack (or bubble) could not be closed unless you reach forge welding temperature (~1400 C). Unfortunately, wootz pattern melt down at 900-1000 C and forge welding of cracks or two ingots 's unlikely (possible but very difficult to bring the pattern black

).

Any flaw appear during forging stage can be easily work around by either trimming out or shortening the piece. IMO,As a smith, the worst flaw 's quench crack

4th April 2006, 01:18 PM	#1
Jens Nordlunde Member Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Europe Posts: 2,718	Hi all, sorry for my absence. Thank you for the answers witch I find very interesting. As the one who knows little about the subject, I have an additional question. From the answers you have written I understand, that the bigger the ingots were the more difficult it was to make them. As far as I know the ingots varied in size from a few hundred grams to about 3 kg, but most were made for making two sword blades out of an ingot. If the big ingots were so difficult to make, why did they not make the small ones only? Is it possible to forge left over from two different ingots together and get a good result? How close it the wooz pattern in the ingots made in the same furnace? Last edited by Jens Nordlunde; 4th April 2006 at 02:36 PM.

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

4th April 2006, 05:08 PM	#3
Jens Nordlunde Member Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Europe Posts: 2,718	Hi Jeff, thank you for your interesting answer. Since you write that a ‘two sword’ ingot easily could end up as a few daggers ingot, there must be a big difference of how much slag there it in the different ingots?

4th April 2006, 05:50 PM	#4
Jeff Pringle Member Join Date: Nov 2005 Posts: 189	No, not slag - sometimes there are 'air' bubbles that need to be worked around, sometimes cracks appear. Typically slag inclusions in wootz are fairly minor.

4th April 2006, 09:30 PM	#5
Jens Nordlunde Member Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Europe Posts: 2,718	I am rather puzzled. ‘Air’ bubbles, what is that, and how do you work your way around them? It is the first time I have ever heard about it. The cracks are something interesting. I know of course that they appeared; most of the collectors know this, but why? One would think that when a blade is heated and worked on cracks would disappear, that the forging would make the blade more homogeneous, so why are the cracks still there?

4th April 2006, 10:37 PM	#6
Justin Member Join Date: Dec 2004 Posts: 180	Thanks,Jeff.

5th April 2006, 03:40 AM	#7
PUFF Member Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: 30 miles north of Bangkok, 20 miles south of Ayuthaya, Thailand Posts: 224	Unlike solid state smelting, the wootz smelting turn whole thing to liquid mixture. With slow cooling, liq. slag and liq. metal separated into two distintive phases like water and oil. Most of impurities partitioned into slag phase and floated up to the surface. I don't know about air bubble. Any bubble in the ingot indicates that smelting temperature 's too low and such a low smelting temp could trap some slag either. Cracks are not "as baked" flaw. They happened when forging stress goes beyond the material elasticity (either forging temp 's too low or hammering 's too hard). Dear Jens, forging would make the blade more homogeneous as slag inclusions were forged out. But flaws like crack (or bubble) could not be closed unless you reach forge welding temperature (~1400 C). Unfortunately, wootz pattern melt down at 900-1000 C and forge welding of cracks or two ingots 's unlikely (possible but very difficult to bring the pattern black ). Any flaw appear during forging stage can be easily work around by either trimming out or shortening the piece. IMO,As a smith, the worst flaw 's quench crack