![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: NC, U.S.A.
Posts: 2,165
|
![]()
I understand and will cry quietly-
![]() ![]() Very nice acquisition either way. Hoping to add a naval spadroon to my collection some day. You are lucky and fortunate to have someone that values your collection. My two daughters and their boyfriends have no interest. Sigh... Mark |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: NC, U.S.A.
Posts: 2,165
|
![]()
Wayne, what is the length of the sword you posted? It looks like a shorter blade; a perfect connection to onboard sea use! Also, how about a pic of that eagle head American sword? Unless you posted it in the past and I missed it?
Mark ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Room 101, Glos. UK
Posts: 4,224
|
![]()
Sadly, it's likely a reproduction & i've been asked not to post them by the management.
The 'real' one has a 24.75 in. blade, perfect for naval use. Can't see any markings but there is an area near the guard that is scratched an looks like it may have had a two line label along the blade rather than across. it instantly became one of my favourites. posted here earlier: http://www.vikingsword.com/vb/showpo...03&postcount=3 Last edited by kronckew; 29th March 2018 at 11:08 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Nipmuc USA
Posts: 514
|
![]()
Knot rings do not necessarily note naval. Many stirrup shaped knuckle guards (five ball or not) have the enlarged casting boss near the pommel without having being drilled for a ring. The long grooves on a grip are regarded as reeding, as opposed to ribbing (at least in many texts.
A small spadroon file with some variety that I have archived You'll see another shallow reeded ivory in there, files to large to easily attach but lots to browse. https://drive.google.com/drive/folde...DQ?usp=sharing The shallow reeding/ribbing of the object sword is less common than a more regular spacing while not being terribly unusual. Although not necessarily the origin, I have noted it on some grips (typically dove head hilts) from the Netherlands. However, Ames of the US using an uneven reeding well into the 19th century, albeit more contoured vs the smooth with grooves we see on the object sword. A couple of my ebony grips below and I could show a handful of my horns but not really relevant to the object sword. British horn grips quite brown are steamed and pressed. Continental carved and polished black until later ranging from greenish to dark brown. Some of my stuff. Cheers GC |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Room 101, Glos. UK
Posts: 4,224
|
![]()
I don't think anyone has implied that sword knots were knot (
![]() ![]() A ring can, thru wear or trauma, break off any time after it was out of serve and the sword knot crumbled to dust, thus leaving us with a hole that may have once been occupied. I do think most if not all swords in service would have had an appropriate sword knot during their active service life, whatever their service branch, as they do now. Even the helmet pommeled cross guard one. Hotspur has a very cool collection by the way. Very nice swords all. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Nipmuc USA
Posts: 514
|
![]()
Sword knots were mentioned as required gear, even on foot, in some manuals throughout the 19th century.
I mention knots not necessarily naval, as it becomes a descriptive. I had carried it for a long time myself, from a single book phrase. Cheers GC |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: NC, U.S.A.
Posts: 2,165
|
![]()
Thanks, Glenn, for coming in on this one. Love the excellent specimens you posted as well. Any input on when the actual hole/ring became popular. I used to have an old source book (God knows where I put it) that claimed this was something that became popular in the last decade of the 18th. Your thoughts?
Mark |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|