![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 28
|
![]()
No problem if you have French text to translate. Best is doing it here on the forum so that everybody can benefit from it.
Actually, I have to admit that my only reference "book" is the complete 30 booklets set of Pétard and Ariès, Les Armes Blanches Françaises. I stumbled upon it in a flea market, maybe 8 years ago, and it's the most precious book I have. It is extremely interesting and detailed, but not really monographic enough, in the sense that you will only have the information bits by bits, scattered with the various weapons it come as a comment on. But every time I free some cash, I find something else to buy. Books aren't as sexy as steel, though the knowledge they bring lasts forever. Now as to where the term "attack hilt" comes from, I have no idea. I reminds me slightly of the French term "garde de bataille", but this term describes something completely different, a sort of half basket figuring a shell, found almost exclusively on heavy cavalry sabers as far as I know. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
|
![]()
To start with ...
It doesn't seem that the retracting of the these hilt bars is that of providing a better leaning of the sword against the hip, like in the case of inner folding guards of some swords, as these gardes tournantes hilt bars open towards the outer part. But then ... What would be the primary purpose for articulating the guard ; fold it or unfold it ? Could then the term 'attack' be allusive to its 'offensive' posture, in a manner used in medieval times when sword guards (and pommels) could be used as weapons, when fighting in close quarters ? This is certainly nonsense; just forget it ![]() . Last edited by fernando; 31st December 2017 at 06:30 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: adelaide south australia
Posts: 284
|
![]()
Hi Fernando
I agree, no idea what prompted some one to come up with this system of folding guard. When folded out and locked into place it is quite robust, but the only advantage I can see is it would be easy to pack being flat. Cheers Cathey and Rex |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
|
![]()
Hi Cathy,
I remain with the idea that such reciprocate mechanism was more intended to unfold that to fold... pass the preciosity. As if i was wandering on a fantasy when trying to decipher the attribution of the term "attack", HERE you have an interesting French description of the "garde tournante" in that, even not dominating the language, one may catch a pretty good idea of how english speaking collectors arrived at such term ... attack = combat. Roughly translating ... "The brass guard has two parts, from which one, swiveling, passes from normal position to combat position, by a simple 90º rotation". |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 61
|
![]()
1796 Light Cavalry Officer's Sword with folding sideguard.
Blade is normal 1796 dimensions, and retains considerable bluing and gilding. Blade is signed "Osborn's Warranted". Scabbard has lost most of the gilding on it's mounts. Top chape is detached and has had the hanging ring broken off; is signed "Henry Osborn, Bordesly near Birmingham" Hilt is of gilt copper, pretty worn. The quillon is a restoration (and a little too straight). Original leather covered grip with wire wrap. The interesting feature is the hinged sideguard, ala the French "attack" guards. The facetted ferrule at the grip base has a knob protruding on the right side. The knob is connected to a blade that engages a slot on the hinged sideguard to lock it in place when extended. The spring inside the ferrule that activated the knob/blade is either broken or jammed, and the blade no longer engages the slot, so you can't lock the sideguard now. --ElJay |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|