![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,740
|
![]()
Thank you Alan and I agree with you.
Of course the 9 luk blade looks older than the 5 luk but could it just be because of the metal quality (more porous so prone to corrosion) or poor maintenance? I hesitated to date it to pre-1800 because of the pamor miring at the base (Toya Mambeg or Lawe Satukel?). Is there a clear evidence that these pamor patterns were already made during the 18th century or earlier? More generally am I too conservative to believe that very few common quality blades on the market pre-date 1800 contrary to the assertions from the kris sellers ? Regards |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|