![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Buraimi Oman, on the border with the UAE
Posts: 4,408
|
![]()
The Blade. Depending on which sword school we are looking at the blade could be divided into many more parts than the usual three:
1. The Foible. The part near the blade. 2. The Terzo. The mid section between Foible and Forte. 3. The Forte. The part nearest the hilt. The Foible (Feeble) is considered the weakest section whilst the strongest is the Forte (Fortified or Strongest). Some schools especially Rapier divide into as many as 12 parts for refined skewering techniques! whilst 6 or 9 sections is not unusual. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Buraimi Oman, on the border with the UAE
Posts: 4,408
|
![]() Last edited by Ibrahiim al Balooshi; 27th April 2019 at 04:28 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,193
|
![]()
This is a most salient topic, which I must admit I often fall complacent in, and in a recent post I inadvertently used the term forte to describe the area of the sword nearest/at the base of the guard. I was thinking of 'ricasso' and in which cases often this area of the blade is often in a heavier blocked form and part of the tang.
Just as in the famed 'name game' which often brings spirited debate regarding whatever terms are used for certain edged weapon forms, a misplaced term can throw a discussion into a spiral. Well placed entry on an often key topic, thank you! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|