![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,255
|
Hello Roland,
Did you ever etched this blade? I'd love to see more details! (Considering the tool marks, it doesn't look repolished.) Quote:
I have no problem with this piece predating WW2. I'm quite sure it is from the 20th century though: The blade does not look traditional and the hilt made from 2 parts will not be able to withstand the stress of real usage; also the flamboyant scabbard hints at the same conclusion. Note that there was an established souvenir industry already by the end of the 19th century in Medan (and probably elsewhere); the carving may utilize different motifs but would be consistent from what I have seen from there. And it doesn't look Minang. Regards, Kai |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Germany
Posts: 525
|
Quote:
Hello Kai, yes I already polished the blade but the laminations are so tiny, it is almost impossible to bring them out. You can see some traces of lamination only. The blade has been made from flawlessly forged laminated mono-steel. But there are obvious signs of combat on this blade, the first half of the blade is full of small notches. There are some typically breakouts which appear, when the blade hits a bone. I dont think that we see an export-blade for western market. Regards, Roland |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |||
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,255
|
Hello Roland,
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
1. The tip configuration is more like a generic knife/dagger rather than a typical korambi from Sumatra. 2. The central fuller is only present on one side (and, again, atypical). 3. The back edge is very short (again atypical). 4. The secondary bevel along the edge is ... atypical, sorry. The blade does not look like it has been used for extended periods; I sure can be wrong though! Regards, Kai |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Austria
Posts: 1,913
|
Quote:
I have major doubts about the "signs of combat" as these knives are not even suitable for combat. They are designed to be concealed weapons for surprise upwards attacks to the belly of the opponent. I think that quite often, we collectors, are tempted to see what we want to see. Other that that, both the style of decoration and materials appear to be very similar to my Rencong (as mine is of bone or antler too)... including the monosteel blade, so I tend to believe they come from the same manufacturing centre and they were aimed for the same market. Regards, Marius |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|