![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 7,029
|
![]()
Sorry Gavin, I've already got rid of it, but all I did was a bit of light and contrast adjustment + curves + the unsharp mask. It did make it a little easier to see the entire picture.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Austria
Posts: 1,911
|
![]()
Now a novice's oppinion:
The blade appears to be very old and the engravings don't add too much to the "commercial" aspect of the blade. So, my guess is they are talismanic. ![]() PS: I said that the blade APPEARS to be very old because I believe with this type of blades it is rather easy to age them and make them look ancient. Last edited by mariusgmioc; 12th April 2017 at 04:33 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 7,029
|
![]()
Marius, it is not difficult to create a textured surface on a new blade, but it is extremely difficult, perhaps impossible to create an entire blade that can pass as something from a much earlier time.
The appearance of Gavin's blade is, to my eye, representative of something that pre-dates any recent or current practices used in the false aging of a blade. In other words it is in my opinion old, "old" in this case meaning pre-mid 19th century, and I'm being rather conservative here. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Austria
Posts: 1,911
|
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|