|
|
|
1st March 2017, 04:20 AM
|
#1 | |
|
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,345
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
1st March 2017, 04:59 AM
|
#2 |
|
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The Aussie Bush
Posts: 4,523
|
Hi Jose:
Only way to know for sure is to take the hilt off and see if the gangya is separate. Right now I don't see any clear evidence of separation--the visible line is very straight and shows no edge corrosion or oxidation to suggest a point of separation that has been present for a hundred years or so. I've tried to take similar looking ones apart before, only to discover the gangya was not separate. If this is a hundred year old sword, it is in a remarkable state of preservation. Ian. |
|
|
|
1st March 2017, 11:38 PM
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Witness Protection Program
Posts: 1,730
|
... another way to find out if the gangya is separated is to see if the encircled part of the kris provided are attached or not
|
|
|
|
|
3rd March 2017, 10:58 PM
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 1,294
|
Maybe these additional pictures will help to determine if the gangya is separate.
|
|
|
|
|
5th March 2017, 03:11 AM
|
#5 |
|
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,345
|
I have had 3 similar Maguindanao kris (one stolen, one sold off) and the construction was nearly identical, and all 3 had separate gangas. I think this one is also.
|
|
|
|
|
5th March 2017, 03:48 AM
|
#6 |
|
Keris forum moderator
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 7,250
|
Looks separate to me, just in case anyone is in the market for 2 cents.
 
|
|
|
|
|
5th March 2017, 11:09 AM
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2016
Posts: 184
|
Nice! Congratulations!
|
|
|
|
 |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
