![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,255
|
![]()
Hello, welcome to the forum!
It does look like a nice blade. I'd second David's request for more pics! Close-ups are really needed to evaluate a blade and also try to narrow down the type of wood utlized. As already indicated, it would also be necessary to define "high quality" - the highest quality was usually reserved for royalty. Even then, the highest quality for one region/sultanate might not be valued exactly the same elsewhere (and vice versa)... (Same-o with different eras, so period may also be an issue to keep in mind.) Regards, Kai |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2016
Posts: 184
|
![]() Quote:
My intention was to purchase a keris as a souvenir but I wanted one that was of better quality than the ordinary tourist keris. I recently started an antique Moro kris collection and I wanted a keris melayu that would fit in. I saw a wide variety when I was searching but this was most similar to the ones I saw at the Islamic Arts Museum. I am happy, based on your comments, that this appears to be of an "acceptable" standard. Your words are very reassuring. I've also looked at many keris online and I saw some very refined examples. The ones for royalty are probably (surely) of a much higher standard than the one I got. I find this a very interesting topic. Especially how standards vary across time and space. There's so much to learn! Thank you for your insights. I am looking forward to learning more. I will post close ups soon. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 328
|
![]()
Definitely a nice piece. The scabbard looks very recent (normal for most keris) and the hilt is rather crudely made. But it is the blade that matters.
If it were mine I would only change the hilt. Impossible to attribute an age from a photo and very difficult on visual examination. Few experts can do that. (I don't give you the names as I would not forget somebody....) Best wishes for a new keris-addicted. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Italy
Posts: 928
|
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 1,209
|
![]()
If this is a souvenir, you could say that this keris is certainly acceptable and decent. Well done!!
The ukiran is more Jawa Deman. A good Bugis ukiran is more the pistol hilted grip. I would try to get such an ukiran. But it is a very nice keris suitable for every serious keris collection. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,255
|
![]()
Hello Henk,
Quote:
Note the selut which would be typical for the Terengganu region and more suitable for this hilt type. Regards, Kai |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Keris forum moderator
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 7,212
|
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 1,209
|
![]()
Sorry for the confusion gentlemen. The english language is not my mother language. The hilt Kai showed is the one i ment and is in my opnion more suitable for this keris.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|