![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Germany
Posts: 525
|
![]() Quote:
The dagger is either from 19th century historicism but more probably a genuine piece from 14th to 16th century in very well condition. If the dagger is real, it is an very extraordinary well preserved piece and pretty rare. Roland |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 233
|
![]()
The blade looks to me to show signs of being older but a shortened blade coming from another source. Maybe a 19th C bayonet from something else? The guard and pommel look to be newer. Maybe some better pictures of ends of them?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Black Forest, Germany
Posts: 1,226
|
![]() Quote:
Today it should not make great problems to get a rectangular base out of a round base by help of heat and high pressure. Sorry, but for me this dagger is a fake. corrado26 ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 31
|
![]()
more photo
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 31
|
![]()
more foto
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 435
|
![]()
It looks to me to be an interesting assembly of previously unrelated parts.
The blank surfaces of the pommel and guard do not seem to belong on the same object as the hilt, which itself can't seem to decide how it intends to be decorated. The cruciform marking is not in keeping with the other decoration. Bear in mind, I know little or nothing about this sort of dagger, so you're getting an opinion backed only by my aging eyesight. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Heidelberg, Germany
Posts: 183
|
![]()
Looks modern to me.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Member
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 31
|
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|