Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > European Armoury

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 16th June 2016, 03:24 PM   #1
Roland_M
Member
 
Roland_M's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Germany
Posts: 525
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by corrado26
I think this item is a not very old piece. At least the blade is probably made from the blade of a French Lebel bajonet M 1916.
corrado26
The Lebel has a round base, but the rondel dagger has a rectangular tang.

The dagger is either from 19th century historicism but more probably a genuine piece from 14th to 16th century in very well condition.

If the dagger is real, it is an very extraordinary well preserved piece and pretty rare.


Roland
Roland_M is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th June 2016, 04:29 PM   #2
CSinTX
Member
 
CSinTX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 233
Default

The blade looks to me to show signs of being older but a shortened blade coming from another source. Maybe a 19th C bayonet from something else? The guard and pommel look to be newer. Maybe some better pictures of ends of them?
CSinTX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th June 2016, 04:49 PM   #3
corrado26
Member
 
corrado26's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Black Forest, Germany
Posts: 1,226
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roland_M
The Lebel has a round base, but the rondel dagger has a rectangular tang.

Today it should not make great problems to get a rectangular base out of a round base by help of heat and high pressure. Sorry, but for me this dagger is a fake.
corrado26
corrado26 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th June 2016, 04:58 PM   #4
messia
Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 31
Default

more photo
Attached Images
      
messia is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th June 2016, 09:10 PM   #5
messia
Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 31
Default

more foto
Attached Images
      
messia is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th June 2016, 04:43 AM   #6
Bob A
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 435
Default

It looks to me to be an interesting assembly of previously unrelated parts.

The blank surfaces of the pommel and guard do not seem to belong on the same object as the hilt, which itself can't seem to decide how it intends to be decorated. The cruciform marking is not in keeping with the other decoration.

Bear in mind, I know little or nothing about this sort of dagger, so you're getting an opinion backed only by my aging eyesight.
Bob A is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th June 2016, 10:01 AM   #7
stekemest
Member
 
stekemest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Heidelberg, Germany
Posts: 183
Default

Looks modern to me.
stekemest is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th June 2016, 10:36 AM   #8
messia
Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 31
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by stekemest
Looks modern to me.
Dagger is not modern, I bought a dagger in the old collector, collector bought the knife from an old friend, age Dagger minimum 80 years was in the hands of these people
messia is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:09 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.