![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,255
|
![]() Quote:
![]() Also if this were an important advantage, wouldn't one expect to see it more often than in a one-off example? IMVHO, it seems like overkill to fix loose lower ferrule sections (if any) this way: It doesn't look like a makeshift repair and could be done/restored more nicely back home (considering this was a status piece and not a basic run-of-the-mill budiak). A spear with damaged tang socket or ferrule at its base needs a really sound repair for the heavy spearhead tang being stable (without risk of breaking loose in a fight). While we have seen native repairs for Moro pieces holding up well, this does seem a bit of a stretch to me... ![]() Regards, Kai |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 422
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,295
|
![]()
Well Kai, in both cases we seem to have a ferrule (on spear) or hilt (on Kris) consisting of many segments.
A grip at this place near the spear point would be VERY impractical indeed. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,325
|
![]()
My original thoughts came from similar examples with 1 rod in a similar construction made for that type of use.
Now for keeping the ferrule together, I would not expect so much construction. Perhaps there is more damage than meets the eye for this type of stronger than unusual and elaborate construction. That too would make sense to me. Also the weight of the extra work moves the balance forward and not in the middle. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|