![]() |
![]() |
#19 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,255
|
![]()
Hello Alan,
I fully agree that preventive control is paramount and that one needs to stomp in strongly to prevent the extinction of rhinos, tigers, and - to a slightly lesser or more local extent - elephants. Much easier to talk about than implement, of course. And we need to talk honestly about poverty and failing elites, for sure. Quote:
![]() I don't argue that it would have *some* deterrent effect... ![]() However, I do hold that even severe penalties are a very inefficient tool: Even in the middle ages when the penalties mentioned by you were liberally applied (at least to the lower strata of society) it certainly did not *prevent* major offences from being perpetrated. While we certainly also need to talk about penalties if deemed too weak, I'd posit that we can have humane penalties and still achieve needed preventive measures (i. e. let's keep them mostly in the non-preventive realm - what you call detective control). IMNSHO penalties (as well as laws/legislation in general) need to be continuously monitored/evaluated if they really achieve their intended goals. As we have argued here, it's too easy to go overboard, even with good intentions! Regards, Kai |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|