![]() |
|
|
#11 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Russia
Posts: 1,042
|
Quote:
It's simple, it seems to me If Asadula - a well-known person (sword master), it must be mentioned in the writings of the time when he lived (17 century). But no one can give an example of such a manuscript .... If we see this manuscript, of course I'll be the first to say that Assadula was a real person. So far, unfortunately, there are no such data.In the absence of this evidence, all other arguments are (I think) - just "mind games" ![]() There are real Persian sword of the 17th century. Such swords save some, but they are. And know exactly where they are stored. Neither one of them no has a cartouche "Assadula". Moreover, as I have said before, the Persian sword of the 17th century are not similar to those sabers, which we used to call "Persian Shamshir" and wherein the blade has a cartouche "Asadula". ![]() Draw conclusions* *
|
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|