![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Solihull, UK
Posts: 81
|
![]()
oh my! that 2nd sword from your post immediately above mine is one of the most gorgeous looking swords i have ever seen.
What is the scabbard made of, and in which museum does this beauty reside? Thank you for keeping this thread civil so it can continue. Although not my area of collecting it has been fascinating seeing the paintings and some of the examples posted. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Russia
Posts: 1,042
|
![]() Quote:
I also really like the first and second shashkas ![]() Now they are kept in the Hermitage in Russia |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,193
|
![]()
Indeed it is great to see this discourse return to the now apparent diversion to this fascinating study of Bukharen and Afghan swords, which in itself is probably one of the most esoteric areas of the edged weapons on Central Asia.
It is almost unfortunate that this particular discussion has begun under the title of the original post which pertains to the distinguished Russian artist Vasily Vereshchagin, as these swords certainly deserve their own titled thread to bring in broader interest in their study. Meanwhile, I am very grateful for all of the fantastic pictures of these swords and the most interesting attention to their features and details. I would have to agree however, that this curious debate over the number of rivets or their size is to me fully specious. While there are seemingly some preponderances such as five rivets placed on the Bukharen sabres as appeared in Mr. Flindt's venerable article, he did note potential variances. As far as I can imagine, the development and production of these types of saber (Bukharen) and the cleft pommel shashka like versions attributed to Afghanistan and Uzbekistan are so predisposed to cross diffusion that most finite attribution is unlikely, if not nearly impossible. As I have mentioned many times, as Mr. Flindt once said to me, weapons have NO geographic boundaries. This was noted in what became a rather inconclusive struggle to classify one of these 'shashkas' as either Uzbek or Afghan about 18 years ago. While it I was once told that the Bukharen sabre had of course nothing to do with the shashka, it remains seemingly likely that the profound Russian presence in these regions in the times of the "Great Game" (c. 1813-1907) certainly may have influenced these Uzbek and Afghan sabres with the distinct cleft pommels. The Khanate of Bukhara was of course situated in Uzbekistan in the 18th century, and Uzbekistan included a notable part of Northern Afghanistan until the mid 19th century. As most of these sword forms evolved in these particular times amidst all of this geopolitical turmoil, then it seems almost futile to assign a distinct classification and pattern of features responsibly to any of them unless using other mitigating factors in their decoration etc. What remains undisputed regardless, is that these 'Central Asian' sabres are some of the most intriguing, beautiful and exciting swords in the spectrum of the sabre. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 1,492
|
![]() Quote:
Last edited by estcrh; 11th February 2016 at 04:11 AM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,272
|
![]()
W
![]() I never heard of Bukharen shashqas until this thread! And what beautiful examples! Amazing (putting eyes back in their sockets) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Russia
Posts: 1,042
|
![]()
Bukhara shashkas from Russian museums.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Russia
Posts: 1,042
|
![]() Last edited by mahratt; 12th February 2016 at 06:50 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,818
|
![]() Quote:
Having a pair of hilts in the same manner, this is what I suspect at face value. I suspect a timber inner core with a possible "Moroccan" leather inner throat area for the blade. The outer is dressed with a silver, almost entirely like a honey comb or reptile scale pattern, but specifically a random pattern with each hole is the final appearance. Again, I suspect as I only see the final product in hand, but small turquoise and garnet stones are resin inset in to each tiny hole, once cured, ground, polished and shaped with a wheel. These hilt types are mostly considered as political gifts to other rulers and men of standing as only the Amir had the means for such time, expense and beauty. Gavin |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|