![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 865
|
![]()
Welcome Asian Paldain! Glad to see you have joined
![]() Interesting blade, Asian Paldain, lovely carving. To me it looks like the kind of dragon lion hybrid type figure with distinct Balinese features/ style. I know a Makara when I see it...the handle is not a Makara, which is of Hindu origin and commonly seen throughout South east Asia. A Makara has an elephant like trunk and other characteristics of a sea type creature. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Makara_(Hindu_mythology) Note in the bottom of it is shows pictures of the variety of Makara throughout Asia including the one that Ian correctly identified. ![]() That is all I can really comment about...beyond that it's well out of my knowledge base....the brass pin and the white around of the handle just below the ferrule jumps out at me.... Last edited by Nathaniel; 9th October 2015 at 12:05 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Te Aroha, New Zealand
Posts: 122
|
![]()
Thanks for the continuing inputs gentlemen, you have been validating more of my suspicions and dispelling some of my preconceived notions regarding this sword. When Ian said the sword looks like something from Sumatra it sprang into my mind that the finely carved dragon hilt looks like the type of work that comes from Bali, as shown by Detlef. I also noted that it is quite different from a typical makara due to the absence of an elephant trunk as Nathaniel pointed out. So I search the Internet and found that Bali has this mythological creature known as Barong and one form of this is the Barong Naga (so the barong-type ferrule kinda fits I guess LOL) which has been depicted in Balinese masks and temple statues. Actually I don't really mind if this is a sword from married parts as it looks finely and exquisitely done, not a haphazardly assembled Frankenstein's monster. The pristine state of the carved hilt makes me think it could be later than the rest of the sword but I am thinking (or hoping I should say) the sword could have been assembled not later than the 1930s.
Regards, Algelan Last edited by Aslan Paladin; 9th October 2015 at 05:44 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Te Aroha, New Zealand
Posts: 122
|
![]()
I am posting a comparative picture of the sword and a Balinese ceremonial wedung/blakas. Their blades both have a chisel grind and a clipped point. And the base of both blades seem to have the same shape except that the blakas has a long protrusion. It seems that this sword might be entirely Balinese, a Balinese pedang, and not a marriage of different parts. I haven't seen a uniquely Balinese pedang before (although Zonneveld mentions a pedang bentok and pedang chembul but shows no pictures).
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|