![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,060
|
![]() Quote:
. very best wishes, Jasper Last edited by cornelistromp; 26th May 2015 at 05:34 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: adelaide south australia
Posts: 284
|
![]()
H Jim,
I purchased both books from Ken Trotman, they are referenced as follows M099.WEYERSBERG (A.) SOLINGER SCHWERTSCHMIEDE : 1 : 20.00 M009.KINMAN (S.) EUROPEAN MAKERS OF EDGED WEA : 1 : 45.00 Prices in pounds. deliver was very quick. Cheers Cathey and Rex |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: adelaide south australia
Posts: 284
|
![]()
Type of Weapon: Scottish Basket hilted Broad Sword
Date: Circa 1730 (18th Century) Overall Length: 101.6 cm (40 inches) Blade length: 87 cm (34.3 inches) Blade widest point: 3.3 cm (1.3 inches) Hilt widest point: 11.5 cm Inside grip length: 9.6 cm Marks, etc.: Numerous marks to blade shoulder and in both fullers haven’t identified any of them as yet. Description Basket Hilt-Scottish-c1730-Broad Sword: - Thick steel basket Hilt has typical heart and circle decoration made of thick flat bars, no wrist guard. Blade length is pitted and has dark patina, numerous marks visible on blade shoulder and both fullers, probably German. The fuller runs almost the entire length of the blade. The blade may predate the hilt however they appear to have been together for very long time. Cheers Cathey and Rex |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,060
|
![]()
Description
Basket Hilt-Scottish-c1730-Broad Sword: - Thick steel basket Hilt has typical heart and circle decoration made of thick flat bars, no wrist guard. Blade length is pitted and has dark patina, numerous marks visible on blade shoulder and both fullers, probably German. The fuller runs almost the entire length of the blade. The blade may predate the hilt however they appear to have been together for very long time. Cheers Cathey and Rex[/QUOTE] @ Cathey, the blade seems indeed older, 150-200 year, out of the first half of the 16th century and maybe shortened. this type of mark I noticed more often at the ricasso of a so-called compound or complex hilt from the first half of the 16th century. Always on the left side of the ricasso (pommel up) of a double fullered blade. best, Last edited by cornelistromp; 31st May 2015 at 12:41 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,295
|
![]()
Cathey, thank you so much for the source for those titles, Trotman is an excellent seller.
Jasper, nice catch on that blade! Best regards, Jim |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 428
|
![]() Quote:
the blade seems indeed older, 150-200 year, out of the first half of the 16th century and maybe shortened. this type of mark I noticed more often at the ricasso of a so-called compound or complex hilt from the first half of the 16th century. Always on the left side of the ricasso (pommel up) of a double fullered blade. best,[/QUOTE] Hi Jasper and Cathy, the marks on the blade look like they are from the same maker, and yes the blade is from the first half of the 16th century , from south German Or North Italian origin. The blade in the basket hilt is a similar blade and looks shortened. Or it could be a blade from the same maker forged in different dimensions to begin with. The blade of the complex hilt measures 4,5 CM at the cross guard and is 106,5 CM long. I cant measure the blade on the basket hilt but I think 3,5 would be close. Also the fullers on the one and a half sword are 7 mm wide. @ Jasper , you'r first picture is from that Italian book, but were did you find the picture of the second sword ? kind regards Ulfberth Last edited by ulfberth; 1st June 2015 at 10:03 AM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,060
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: adelaide south australia
Posts: 284
|
![]()
Hi Jasper and Ulfberth
Thanks for the example of what does appear to be the same mark on the ricasso, pity we cannot establish who the mark belonged to. I am still trying to decide what the marks lower down on the blade itself might be. The middle one looks almost like a scimitar sword, however I think the longer I stare at it the less I know what is. Cheers Cathey and Rex |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|