![]()  | 
	
| 
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#1 | 
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
				
			
			Join Date: Nov 2004 
				Location: USA 
				
				
					Posts: 1,725
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Maybe a bayonet section?
		 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#2 | 
| 
			
			 Vikingsword Staff 
			
			
			
				
			
			Join Date: Dec 2004 
				Location: The Aussie Bush 
				
				
					Posts: 4,521
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			This cross section is not uncommon on sword sticks from various parts of Europe, and even Britain. I don't have an example in my collection (not that I have many sword sticks) but I've certainly seen them from time to time. 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	Ian.  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#3 | 
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
				
			
			Join Date: Dec 2004 
				Location: Madrid / Barcelona 
				
				
					Posts: 256
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			This hollow triangular crossection is very common to see in 19th c. "duelling swords" and 18th-19th c. smallswords. As examples of the later: 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			Smallsword, French, 2nd empire: ![]() ![]() ![]() Smallsword, French, late 18th. c: ![]() ![]() ![]() Today, this type of cross-section can be seen in the direct descendent of these weapons: the sport fencing blades. So, it's not strange to find it in such a vintage swordstick. Which is very nice, by the way, I must say...  
		Last edited by Marc; 1st December 2005 at 10:23 AM.  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#4 | 
| 
			
			 (deceased) 
			
			
			
				
			
			Join Date: Dec 2004 
				Location: Portugal 
				
				
					Posts: 9,694
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Thank you all for the quick reaction. 
		
		
		
			I am happy i now have vital references on the blade. Marc's first set of pictures has precisely the same cross section of my example ... or what theres is left of it: a mere eight inches of the tip section. I may now assume this is a leftover from one of such period dwelling swords accidented blade. Indeed the components are nice and even have a little age patina, but i don't think they were a born set. The coupling ring shines as modern, and the handle was trimmed to fit into it. The well finished bamboo cane was hollowed for a much longer blade, plus other details. I am glad that the blade (part of it) is genuine and so adds some seriousness to the trio. Kind regards Very nice swords, Mark.  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
![]()  | 
	
	
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread | 
| Display Modes | |
		
  | 
	
		
  |