![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,339
|
![]()
Can you show a shot looking at the fit of blade to scabbard ?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Member
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 116
|
![]() Quote:
The fit in the scabbard is very good, no rattle at all. One last thing, the ganjah is loose on the tang. Not bad, but its a bit annoying. You can see in that first picture how loose and cocked off the ganjah is, but the fineness of the akut, is it? has me hesitant. This hulu is really on there, and I am sure I could fix the ganjah, but…. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,339
|
![]()
The pamor almost looks drawn on the blade; but I know it is not .
![]() The blade has a nice polish . Bali or Lombok . |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Keris forum moderator
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 7,218
|
![]()
Respectable old Bali keris. The blade is a little unusually short for Bali blades, but not unprecedented. I have one that only just a bit longer that yours. The sheath looks to be a true pelet patterned wood. Sometimes they fake this with markers or dye. Pamor names aren't my strong point, but yours looks to be a fairly common kulit semangka (melon pattern).
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Member
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 116
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,339
|
![]()
^^^
First, do no harm . It does not appear 'broke' to me . ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,280
|
![]()
It has the original polish and more then remains of an original Bali staining, about/or more then 100 years old. This is bekoming quite rare now, I wouldn't touch it as a whole blade.
My oppinion is, information given by Mr. Farrow is reliable. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|