![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 6,992
|
![]()
Erik, perhaps you may care to share at least your current thoughts on keris legitimacy with us?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 318
|
![]()
My personal definition is very simple - intent for use (ceremonial or otherwise) in a keris bearing society made by a person onderstanding that society and the intended purpose of the keris.
Otherwise, to me, it can be a piece of art or craftmanship but not a keris. The problem with intent is that it is not "measurable" after the fact, although there may be clues to what the intent could have been. In my earlier defintions traditions of making were of influence as well but such traditions are everchanging so it can not be a sustainable definition. Regards, Erik Last edited by erikscollectables; 2nd March 2014 at 04:44 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|