![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Olomouc
Posts: 1,708
|
![]()
Interesting to see the leather on the sheath. The scabbard bands look to be of the same age and material as the ferrule?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Germany, Dortmund
Posts: 9,165
|
![]() Quote:
the leather on the throath of the scabbard is typical for Visayan swords. And the way how it's attached let me think that it is more early as from Kai supposed, see here: http://www.vikingsword.com/vb/showth...hlight=visayan And yes, I agree, the material of the ferrule and scabbard bands are the same material and seems from the same age. My guess of the age would be 1920-1930. ![]() I think by the quality of the blade that it's an old fighter. Regards, Detlef |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Witness Protection Program
Posts: 1,730
|
![]()
age-wise, i would guess around WW2, Detlef. could be older tho. the bands and ferrule appears to be made out of steel. as far as the pommel, it's a bakunawa (ilonggo version of naga).
i would call this binangon, just to be on the safe side, although as far the the blade is concern, it could be classified as tinegre, from the root word tigre, meaning tiger. that's because it's shape like a tiger's tooth... |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Germany, Dortmund
Posts: 9,165
|
![]() Quote:
![]() Regards, Detlef |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,272
|
![]()
Just saw this now. I completely agree with Ron - WWII or after. It is also the lack of patina on the bands and wood, the style of the pommel, and the thinness of the guard.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|