![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
(deceased)
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Bavaria, Germany - the center of 15th and 16th century gunmaking
Posts: 4,310
|
![]() Quote:
Hi Marcus, Once more I must say that I like that ca. 1540 mug-shaped interchangeable breech of yours a whole lot! For more than 20 years I had a similar one, only slender and about 100 years earlier, ca. 1440, which is extremely early for breechloaders; it now is in 'Nando's collection! ![]() http://www.vikingsword.com/vb/showth...oading+chamber Best, Michael |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 535
|
![]()
Hi Michael,
Thank you very much for the information, i also bought a iron cannonbal which fits the dimensions of this breech chamber, but i doubt that the cannonbal is nearly as old as the chamber (good enough for presentational purposes though). ![]() I will post a other neat item shortly ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
(deceased)
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Bavaria, Germany - the center of 15th and 16th century gunmaking
Posts: 4,310
|
![]()
Hi Marcus,
Not that any ball was originally part of a breechloading chamber ... As I have shown in my thread and demonstrated by photos of a ca. 1480-1500 Late-Gothic chamber dug up still loaded only with powder and a wooden plug, the ball was separately shoved in at the rear of the barrel, at the beginning of the breech recess, before the powder chamber/breech was inserted. Best, Michael Last edited by Matchlock; 5th December 2013 at 04:31 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 535
|
![]()
Ingineus, did they do this (the wooden plug) to make a solid seal for the chamber which would still be less stressfull than a iron seal? Or?
sorry if you are already told this in the thread, i will read it soon (Dutch holiday is tonight so ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
(deceased)
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Bavaria, Germany - the center of 15th and 16th century gunmaking
Posts: 4,310
|
![]()
I guess the breech plug was mainly there in order to prevent the fine meal powder from falling out, and to preserve it from moisture.
The thread I told about this fact is here: http://www.vikingsword.com/vb/showthread.php?t=7364 Best, m |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
|
![]() Quote:
Have i heard that such plugging was also made of wax ? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
(deceased)
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Bavaria, Germany - the center of 15th and 16th century gunmaking
Posts: 4,310
|
![]()
Wax?
For sealing interchangeable iron 'patrons' for long guns and hand firearms, possibly ... we have no records of such a surviving piece though. What we do know for sure, however, is that in early-19th service manuals (by Beroaldo Bianchini et al.), the soldier was ordered to keep the muzzle of his loaded long gun (flintlock musket) closed by either a wooden 'anti-rain' plug (Old German Regenpfropfen) fitted with a lead cover and either cloth or leather side straps (I do keep some 20 original muzzle plugs of 16th to 19th c. date in my collection). Early-17th c. musketeers on watch used to seal and tighten the closed covers of the primed pans of their matchlock muskets by tallow (Old German Unschlitt) against both moisture and fine priming powder that was literally everywhere on their clothes ... The huntsman of the muzzle-loading era, on the other hand, used to seal the muzzle of his gun by a hard wax plug - which of course had to be carefully removed before each shot, in order to prevent the barrel from horribly bulging or bursting ...!!! ![]() ![]() Best, Michl Last edited by Matchlock; 5th December 2013 at 07:08 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|