![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 130
|
![]()
Stone ball cannons had the chamber narrower than the bore.
Apparently this artillery system disappeared during the 17th century. Interestingly this system, with a smaller diameter powder chamber, persisted well into the 19th century & was used with shell firing ordnance such as mortars, howitsers & some shell guns etc. Regarding stone cannon balls, the Royal Armouries experimented with some stone shot from Mary Rose & demonstrated its ability to easily penetrate great thicknesses of timber representing the side of a ship, when recovered the shot was still mostly intact. So the use of lead covered iron shot is rather curious, I think that less wear to the bore than with iron alone was a definite benefit, many of the larger natures of ordnance on Mary Rose were bronze and iron shot would scour this badly, & I would surmise that the intent was to provide for a limited supply of heavier weight of shot than the stone shot. Much later iron shot were of course used in bronze guns, but with a wood bottom strapped on (later rivetted on) to minimise bore damage. Adrian |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|