![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 12
|
![]()
Thanks for your reply, Michael!
Actually, my lack of expertise on katzbalgers and other 16th century swords has already cost me a lot of money. About eight years ago I purchased what was purportedly a genuine katzbalger from a dealer (now deceased) who shall go nameless. I found out through Bonhams (I think it was Bonhams and Butterfields then) it was a fake as were the bastard sword, war hammer, and two handed sword I also bought from this dealer (some of the items were not strictly fakes apparently; rather, they were Victorian copies, though the dealer described them as genuine originals). I ended up disposing of all of them through Bonhams in their San Francisco sale of June 29, 2005. If you have a copy of this catalog, the four items I mentioned are on page 79: 2413, 2414, 2415, and 2416. ![]() Eric |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
(deceased)
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Bavaria, Germany - the center of 15th and 16th century gunmaking
Posts: 4,310
|
![]()
Hi Eric,
I am sad to hear this, though it was just another version of the same old story. I am sure you have doing a lot better with the stuff you are collecting now, and I have noticed Jim commenting on your espada ancha! Best, Michael |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
(deceased)
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Bavaria, Germany - the center of 15th and 16th century gunmaking
Posts: 4,310
|
![]()
Another Katzbalger copy, 19th c., in North Italian early-16th c. style.
It is in the Tojhusmuseet Copenhagen, and an almost identical item is in a German private collection which has been published in a monography. m |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,060
|
![]()
from the sale; the Karsten Klingbeil collection.
attributed to the 19thC. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,060
|
![]()
to make life easy, a probably 19th century katzbalger sold as a 16th century one by Sothebys. and a probably 16th century katzbalger sold as 19th century by Czerny (black background).
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
|
![]()
Amazing
![]() If you haven't mentioned the black background detail, i would have inferred the other way round ![]() Not knowing is like not seeing ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
(deceased)
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Bavaria, Germany - the center of 15th and 16th century gunmaking
Posts: 4,310
|
![]()
Actually, this one was found to be absolutely original by my friend. He had known it for more than twenty years when it was in a North German collection, still heavily patinated but not for sale, not even for 20,000 Deutschmark.
20 years later, he recognized it at once at Czerny's though it got cleaned meanwhile, and he got it extremely cheap because nobody would believe! Best, m Last edited by Matchlock; 3rd May 2012 at 07:49 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 12
|
![]() Quote:
I totally agree with you!! Does anybody know why Czerny mistakenly identified this 16th century sword as 19th century in terms of specifics, i.e. to Czerny's specialist the hilt appeared suspicious, the blade was uncharacteristic, etc.? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|