![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 247
|
![]()
Hi Matchlock, did you have more information regarding the portouguese schiavona's ? I mean from literature ?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
(deceased)
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Bavaria, Germany - the center of 15th and 16th century gunmaking
Posts: 4,310
|
![]()
No, if I had so I would have posted them.
m |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 131
|
![]()
Lovely sword! But the pommel is almost certainly a modern replacement. What do you all think?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
(deceased)
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Bavaria, Germany - the center of 15th and 16th century gunmaking
Posts: 4,310
|
![]()
My friend thinks the pommel is original and characteristic of a Portuguese type of schiavona.
Best, Michael |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 131
|
![]()
Look at all the other bronze alloy pommels. Completely different lines and workmanship- and not because of country of origin. In my opinion, the pommel is lost wax cast bronze, rather crude, poor lines, and the tang is crudely peened on to it. The grip itself looks old, perhaps period, but may not go to this sword. Look at the end of the grip, nearest the pommel.
A great sword, with some not-unexpected modern work done to it, in my humble opinion. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 247
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|