|  | 
|  13th February 2012, 08:44 PM | #1 | 
| Member Join Date: Nov 2010 
					Posts: 39
				 |  Mahdist daggers     | 
|   |   | 
|  13th February 2012, 09:03 PM | #2 | 
| Arms Historian Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Route 66 
					Posts: 10,660
				 |   
			
			Nice! Was there a question or observation? What do you know about provenance, the style of hilt etc. Do you collect in this field? | 
|   |   | 
|  13th February 2012, 09:50 PM | #3 | 
| Member Join Date: Nov 2010 
					Posts: 39
				 |   
			
			I would translate it. .jpg)  | 
|   |   | 
|  13th February 2012, 09:51 PM | #4 | 
| Member Join Date: Nov 2010 
					Posts: 39
				 |   
			
			I would translate it.  inside the square is the year?? .jpg)  | 
|   |   | 
|  13th February 2012, 10:40 PM | #5 | 
| Member Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: Moscow, Russia 
					Posts: 118
				 |   
			
			Nice, here's mine!
		 | 
|   |   | 
|  14th February 2012, 12:48 AM | #6 | 
| Member Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Paris (FR*) Cairo (EG) 
					Posts: 1,142
				 |   
			
			Translation for the date 1123 Hegira either ±1711 Gregorian à + Dom | 
|   |   | 
|  14th February 2012, 07:11 AM | #7 | 
| Member Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Room 101, Glos. UK 
					Posts: 4,259
				 |   
			
			they also come in straight.
		 | 
|   |   | 
|  14th February 2012, 11:19 AM | #8 | |
| (deceased) Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: East Coast USA 
					Posts: 3,191
				 |   Quote: 
 I find it hard to believe that these daggers are 300 yrs old based on the inscribing. If these are indeed Mahdist period dagger they can't be older than 1885? Lew | |
|   |   | 
|  14th February 2012, 11:58 AM | #9 | |
| Member Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Paris (FR*) Cairo (EG) 
					Posts: 1,142
				 |   Quote: 
 - the paper never refuse ink and when it's engraved in marble or iron   I translate, no more ...   interpretation I leave it for more expert than me   à + Dom | |
|   |   | 
|  14th February 2012, 09:27 PM | #10 | 
| Member Join Date: Nov 2010 
					Posts: 39
				 |   
			
			In portuguese: paper accepts all...  I believe the Mahdists copied what already existed ...in this case: the style of the words Thuluth and the design of daggers. How copied others styles: indian, mamluk, western african .. | 
|   |   | 
|  14th February 2012, 09:46 PM | #11 | 
| Member Join Date: Nov 2010 
					Posts: 39
				 |   
			
			Its a Funj dagger? The rulers of Sennar held the title of Mek (sultan). Their regnal numbers vary from source to source. Amara Dunqas 1503-1533/4 (AH 940) Nayil 1533/4 (AH 940)-1550/1 (AH 957) Abd al-Qadir I 1550/1 (AH 957)-1557/8 (AH 965) Abu Sakikin 1557/8 (AH 965)-1568 Dakin 1568-1585/6 (AH 994) Dawra 1585/6 (AH 994)-1587/8 (AH 996) Tayyib 1587/8 (AH 996)-1591 Unsa I 1591-1603/4 (AH 1012) Abd al-Qadir II 1603/4 (AH 1012)-1606 Adlan I 1606-1611/2 (AH 1020) Badi I 1611/2 (AH 1020)-1616/7 (AH 1025) Rabat I 1616/7 (AH 1025)-1644/5 Badi II 1644/5-1681 Unsa II 1681-1692 Badi III 1692-1716 Unsa III 1719-1720 Nul 1720-1724 Badi IV 1724-1762 Nasir 1762-1769 Isma'il 1768-1776 Adlan II 1776-1789 Awkal 1787-1788 Tayyib II 1788-1790 Badi V 1790 Nawwar 1790-1791 Badi VI 1791-1798 Ranfi 1798-1804 Agban 1804-1805 Badi VII 1805-1821 | 
|   |   | 
|  14th February 2012, 09:47 PM | #12 | 
| Member Join Date: Nov 2010 
					Posts: 39
				 |   
			
			really, the dagger its previous the mahdist, its a Funj gun?   funj warrior | 
|   |   | 
|  | 
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread | 
| Display Modes | |
| 
 | 
 |