![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 17
|
![]() Quote:
Themis |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 33
|
![]()
hai Alamshah
i believe this kind of material is much older than surakarta era. even the curve of the blade is more majapahit era than mataram , the mataram era keris curve is much deeper than majapahit , so i think i'm agree is this is a majapahit era keris. thanks. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 17
|
![]()
Dear all,
i appreciate your help concerning my keris info. My initial on coming info is that it is majabahit or early majabahit and it has pamor tiban, difficult to be easily identified, but with ganja traces of pamor Tundhung Musuh. It means to push away (and spiritually is for protection). Please take a look at it again and write whatever you believe it could help more. I already thank Alam Shah and Satria and Sepang for their help. Really, Sepang for pamor and rest do you agree with the rest ones? Themis |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Singapore
Posts: 1,248
|
![]() Quote:
In terms of defining the tangguh, I would not know the difference between a majapahit era and a mataram era piece. If you know, kindly enlighthen us. Thanks. ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 17
|
![]()
Dear all,
i keep seeing the keris and other kerises with wos wutah pamor in this site and i find many differencies in patterns. Can anybody enlighten me about it? For example the Javanese keris of Lei Shan Dao is quite different that the one i post here... Sorry for my ignorance... Themis |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 33
|
![]()
to define tangguh keris , we need to know the material of the blade , what kind of iron, pamor works, peksi , and luk style
the luk of this keris isn't surakarta style , ..surakata style luk is much more wavy. and the iron of this keris is more black ... , and the iron of surakarta keris is more grey..... and the most important is ...most of the surakarta keris has tungkaan ..at the end of the ganja. and this keris has kuku bima style kembang kacang. none of the surakarta keris is nggelung wayang.( curve ) in my opinion , this keris is made abt .. end of majapahit era , or early mataram , senopaten |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Singapore
Posts: 1,248
|
![]()
Dear Sepang,
My mistake... ![]() ![]() Last edited by Alam Shah; 11th August 2005 at 09:19 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: East Java
Posts: 137
|
![]()
Hai dear all,
Trully so hard for me to give my opinion at this forum because my english not too good. But I'll trying to write it, Here I posted my keris which I think can represent of each Tangguh (estimated period). 1. Keris Majapahit (13th-early 16th century) 2. Keris Mataram Senopaten (16th century) 3. Keris Mataram Sultan Agung (early period) (17th century) 4. Keris Mataram Sultan Agung (end period / Tundung Madiun) (late 17th century) 5. Keris Pengging (18th century) 6. Keris Mataram Surokarto (18th - 19th century) Indeed that to know the Tangguh of keris is very difficult. We should often hold and see by our self of the keris. Also we can do considering of some keris. We can see that each keris has a different characteristics that can be used to estimated about the tangguh. Perhaps my opinion can make some confused ![]() Regards, Mans. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Singapore
Posts: 1,248
|
![]() Quote:
Just imagine if you throw rice on the floor. There will always be variations. Likewise with keris pamor. Within this pamor formation, sometimes there are other 'hidden' patterns. ![]() Hope this makes it clearer. ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|