|
27th November 2010, 03:11 AM
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Singapore
Posts: 1,180
|
Also, some people think the rashaksa type hilt, esp like hilts 1 and 2, could be depicting Garuda, because of the prominent nose/beak. And Garuda was described in some old texts as a man with bird-like features. I thought there could be such a possibility. If carvers want to depict a divine figure, why not a major deity, instead of a generic rashaksa/giant?
|
|
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Threaded Mode